CRISPR-Cas9 & Gene Editing

Paper IV: Recent Advances — Exam Stat Sheet | Feb 2026
EXAM STATUS CRISPR-Cas9 was asked in 2020 Q6 (UNSLOTTED). Gene therapy for hemoglobinopathies was asked in 2021 Q3 (Slot 3). Per exhaustion principle → LOW repeat probability as standalone. BUT: could appear as part of a hematology (Slot 6), wild card (Slot 10), or as a component within CAR-T / gene therapy answer. The FDA approval of Casgevy (Dec 2023) = major new milestone since last asked → fresh angle possible.

1 THE CRISPR-Cas9 SYSTEM

Core Mechanism
CRISPR = Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (bacterial adaptive immune system vs phage DNA).
Cas9 = CRISPR-associated protein 9, an RNA-guided endonuclease.

sgRNA (single-guide RNA) directs Cas9 to target DNA → generates double-strand break (DSB) → repaired by:
NHEJ (non-homologous end joining) — error-prone → insertions/deletions → gene knockout
HDR (homology-directed repair) — precise → needs DNA template → gene correction/insertion

Evolution of Gene Editing Tools

GenerationToolMechanismLimitation
1stZFNsZinc finger + FokI nucleaseComplex design, expensive
1stTALENsTAL effector + FokI nucleaseLarge size, time-consuming
2ndCRISPR-Cas9sgRNA-guided endonucleaseOff-target DSBs, PAM dependency
3rdBase EditorsnCas9 + deaminase (NO DSBs)Only single-base changes
4thPrime EditorsnCas9 + reverse transcriptase (NO DSBs)Low efficiency, size constraints

Base Editors — Key Details

TypeConversionComponentsClinical Use
CBEC:G → T:AnCas9 + cytidine deaminaseExon skipping (DMD)
ABEA:T → G:CnCas9 + adenine deaminaseBEAM-101 (SCD) — in clinical trial
GBEC → G (glycosylase)nCas9 + glycosylasePreclinical

~60% of pathogenic point mutations could theoretically be corrected by base editors.

Other CRISPR Modalities (Exam Awareness)

SystemWhat It Does
CRISPRidCas9 + repressor (KRAB domain) → transcriptional silencing without cutting DNA
CRISPRadCas9 + activator (VP64) → transcriptional activation → upregulate target gene
Epigenome editingdCas9 + DNMT/TET → alter DNA methylation; + P300/HDAC → alter histone marks
PASTEPrime editor + Bxb1 recombinase → integrate DNA up to 35 Kb

2 FDA-APPROVED CRISPR THERAPIES (Dec 2023)

CASGEVY (Exagamglogene autotemcel)
  • First-ever CRISPR/Cas9 FDA-approved therapy
  • Vertex Pharmaceuticals + CRISPR Therapeutics
  • Approved: Dec 8, 2023 (SCD) + early 2024 (TDT)
  • Age: ≥12 years with recurrent VOC
  • Mechanism: Ex vivo CRISPR editing of autologous HSPCs → disrupts BCL11A erythroid-specific enhancer (+58 kb DHS) → derepresses HbF → HbF inhibits HbS polymerization
  • Result: 94% freedom from VOC ≥1 year
  • HbF in ~46% of blood; 99.7% of RBCs carry HbF
  • BM biopsy: >81% cells with desired edit
  • TDT: 42/44 patients transfusion-free
  • Cost: ~$2.2 million/treatment
LYFGENIA (Lovotibeglogene autotemcel)
  • NOT CRISPR — lentiviral vector gene addition
  • Bluebird Bio Inc.
  • Approved: Same day (Dec 8, 2023) for SCD
  • Mechanism: Lentiviral transduction of autologous HSCs with anti-sickling β-globin transgene (βA-T87Q) → modified globin inhibits sickling
  • Risk: Insertional mutagenesis (2 patients developed blood malignancies 3–5.5 yrs post-transplant)
  • Black box warning for hematologic malignancy
SCD Pathology — One-Liner
β6 Glu→Val (GAG→GTG) in HBB gene → HbS polymerization on deoxygenation → sickle cells → vaso-occlusion → ischemic damage + hemolytic anemia. HbF is protective (γ-globin replaces β-globin function + antisickling properties).

Other SCD Therapies (Comparator Context)

DrugMechanismStatus
Hydroxyurea↑ HbF via stress erythropoiesisFDA — standard of care
L-glutamineReduces oxidative stress in RBCsFDA 2017
CrizanlizumabAnti-P-selectin mAb → ↓ adhesion/VOCFDA 2019
VoxelotorHbS polymerization inhibitorFDA 2019 (withdrawn 2024)
Allogeneic HSCTDonor HSCs replace sickle marrow5-yr OS 92–94%, curative but donor-limited

3 IN VIVO CRISPR — Next Wave (Phase 2/3)

TherapyDiseaseMechanismKey ResultPhase
NTLA-2001 ATTR cardiomyopathy (TTR amyloidosis) IV LNP delivery → CRISPR knockout of TTR gene in liver >90% reduction in pathogenic TTR protein Phase 3
NTLA-2002 Hereditary angioedema (HAE) IV LNP → CRISPR knockout of KLKB1 (kallikrein B1) in liver 91–97% reduction in attack rate; patients attack-free Phase 3
BEAM-101 SCD (next-gen) ABE (base editor) → A-to-G edit in HBG1/HBG2 promoters → ↑ HbF DSB-free; mimics HPFH mutations Phase 1/2
EDIT-101 Leber congenital amaurosis 10 (LCA10) Subretinal AAV5 → corrects CEP290 IVS26 splice mutation First in vivo CRISPR trial (eye) Phase 1/2

NTLA-2001 is the first in vivo CRISPR therapy to reach Phase 3. Uses lipid nanoparticle delivery (no viral vector).

4 CRISPR IN ONCOLOGY (CAR-T Link)

CRISPR-Enhanced CAR-T
CRISPR enables multiplex gene editing of T-cells:
PD-1 knockout → prevent tumor immune evasion
TCR knockout → universal "off-the-shelf" allogeneic CAR-T (no GvHD)
B2M knockout → evade host immune rejection
Clinical trials in hematologic malignancies + solid tumors showing promising results.

CRISPR Diagnostics (Bonus Exam Point)

PlatformCas ProteinTargetApplication
SHERLOCKCas13RNARapid detection — SARS-CoV-2, Zika, Dengue
DETECTRCas12DNAHPV detection, point-of-care

5 DELIVERY SYSTEMS & CHALLENGES

MethodRouteProsConsExample
Ex vivo electroporationEx vivo → reinfuse HSPCs Precise, provenMyeloablation needed, costly Casgevy
AAV vectorsIn vivo (IV, subretinal, IM) Efficient transduction Cargo limit (~4.7kb), immunogenicity, high dose toxicity EDIT-101 (LCA), DMD trials
LNP (lipid nanoparticle)In vivo IV Non-viral, transient expression, liver-tropic Limited tissue targeting beyond liver NTLA-2001, NTLA-2002
Lentiviral vectorsEx vivo Stable integration, large cargo Insertional mutagenesis risk Lyfgenia

Key Safety Concerns

ConcernDetail
Off-target effectsCas9 DSBs at unintended sites → large indels, translocations, chromothripsis
Genotoxicity2 SCD gene therapy patients developed blood malignancies 3–5.5 yrs post-transplant
AAV high-dose toxicityLethal ARDS reported in DMD CRISPRa trial (n-of-1, CRD-TMH-001, AAV9 @ 1×10¹⁴ vg/kg) — death 8 days post-infusion. Investigators attributed to AAV dose, not CRISPR
Immune responsePre-existing anti-AAV antibodies, anti-Cas9 immunity
Cost/AccessCasgevy ~$2.2M; inaccessible to low-income countries (majority of SCD/TDT burden)

6 CRISPR CLINICAL MILESTONES

2012 Doudna & Charpentier — CRISPR-Cas9 as programmable gene editor (Science)
2013 Zhang — CRISPR applied in human cells (Science)
2016 First CRISPR human trial: PD-1 edited T-cells for lung cancer (China)
2018 CTX001 (Casgevy) clinical trials begin for SCD + TDT
2019 EDIT-101 — first in vivo CRISPR trial (subretinal, LCA10)
2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry → Doudna & Charpentier
2021 NTLA-2001 Phase 1 results (ATTR) — first systemic in vivo CRISPR
2023 UK MHRA first to approve Casgevy (Nov)FDA approves Casgevy + Lyfgenia (Dec 8)
2024 Casgevy approved for TDT. NTLA-2001 enters Phase 3. 94 active CRISPR trials.
2025 BEAM-101 (base editing for SCD) in Phase 1/2. Personalized CRISPR therapy for rare diseases emerging.

7 RAPID-FIRE RECALL CARDS

CRISPR-Cas9: sgRNA guides Cas9 → DSB → repaired by NHEJ (knockout) or HDR (correction)
Casgevy = First CRISPR drug (Dec 2023). Edits BCL11A enhancer → ↑HbF → 94% VOC-free at 1yr
Lyfgenia = Lentiviral (NOT CRISPR). Same-day FDA approval. Black box warning: malignancy
Base editors: NO DSBs. CBE = C→T. ABE = A→G. BEAM-101 = ABE for SCD (trial)
Prime editor: nCas9 + RT. Insertions up to 44bp. No DSB, no template needed
NTLA-2001: In vivo CRISPR via LNP for TTR amyloidosis → >90% TTR knockdown (Phase 3)
NTLA-2002: In vivo CRISPR for HAE → 91–97% attack reduction (Phase 3)
SHERLOCK (Cas13/RNA) & DETECTR (Cas12/DNA) = CRISPR diagnostics
Nobel 2020: Doudna + Charpentier for CRISPR-Cas9
Safety troika: Off-targets, genotoxicity (malignancy in 2 patients), AAV immunotoxicity
Casgevy cost: ~$2.2 million — equity crisis for LMICs where SCD burden is highest

8 CROSS-SLOT CONNECTIONS

Q SELF-TEST (Click to Start)

Sources (PubMed):
Laurent et al. Cells 2024; PMID 38786024 — DOI | Rostami et al. Cell Transplant 2024; PMID 38680015 — DOI
Far et al. Cell Prolif 2025 — DOI | Feng et al. MedComm 2024 — DOI | Cetin et al. J Cell Mol Med 2024 — DOI