| Generation | Tool | Mechanism | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | ZFNs | Zinc finger + FokI nuclease | Complex design, expensive |
| 1st | TALENs | TAL effector + FokI nuclease | Large size, time-consuming |
| 2nd | CRISPR-Cas9 | sgRNA-guided endonuclease | Off-target DSBs, PAM dependency |
| 3rd | Base Editors | nCas9 + deaminase (NO DSBs) | Only single-base changes |
| 4th | Prime Editors | nCas9 + reverse transcriptase (NO DSBs) | Low efficiency, size constraints |
| Type | Conversion | Components | Clinical Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBE | C:G → T:A | nCas9 + cytidine deaminase | Exon skipping (DMD) |
| ABE | A:T → G:C | nCas9 + adenine deaminase | BEAM-101 (SCD) — in clinical trial |
| GBE | C → G (glycosylase) | nCas9 + glycosylase | Preclinical |
~60% of pathogenic point mutations could theoretically be corrected by base editors.
| System | What It Does |
|---|---|
| CRISPRi | dCas9 + repressor (KRAB domain) → transcriptional silencing without cutting DNA |
| CRISPRa | dCas9 + activator (VP64) → transcriptional activation → upregulate target gene |
| Epigenome editing | dCas9 + DNMT/TET → alter DNA methylation; + P300/HDAC → alter histone marks |
| PASTE | Prime editor + Bxb1 recombinase → integrate DNA up to 35 Kb |
| Drug | Mechanism | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyurea | ↑ HbF via stress erythropoiesis | FDA — standard of care |
| L-glutamine | Reduces oxidative stress in RBCs | FDA 2017 |
| Crizanlizumab | Anti-P-selectin mAb → ↓ adhesion/VOC | FDA 2019 |
| Voxelotor | HbS polymerization inhibitor | FDA 2019 (withdrawn 2024) |
| Allogeneic HSCT | Donor HSCs replace sickle marrow | 5-yr OS 92–94%, curative but donor-limited |
| Therapy | Disease | Mechanism | Key Result | Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTLA-2001 | ATTR cardiomyopathy (TTR amyloidosis) | IV LNP delivery → CRISPR knockout of TTR gene in liver | >90% reduction in pathogenic TTR protein | Phase 3 |
| NTLA-2002 | Hereditary angioedema (HAE) | IV LNP → CRISPR knockout of KLKB1 (kallikrein B1) in liver | 91–97% reduction in attack rate; patients attack-free | Phase 3 |
| BEAM-101 | SCD (next-gen) | ABE (base editor) → A-to-G edit in HBG1/HBG2 promoters → ↑ HbF | DSB-free; mimics HPFH mutations | Phase 1/2 |
| EDIT-101 | Leber congenital amaurosis 10 (LCA10) | Subretinal AAV5 → corrects CEP290 IVS26 splice mutation | First in vivo CRISPR trial (eye) | Phase 1/2 |
NTLA-2001 is the first in vivo CRISPR therapy to reach Phase 3. Uses lipid nanoparticle delivery (no viral vector).
| Platform | Cas Protein | Target | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHERLOCK | Cas13 | RNA | Rapid detection — SARS-CoV-2, Zika, Dengue |
| DETECTR | Cas12 | DNA | HPV detection, point-of-care |
| Method | Route | Pros | Cons | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex vivo electroporation | Ex vivo → reinfuse HSPCs | Precise, proven | Myeloablation needed, costly | Casgevy |
| AAV vectors | In vivo (IV, subretinal, IM) | Efficient transduction | Cargo limit (~4.7kb), immunogenicity, high dose toxicity | EDIT-101 (LCA), DMD trials |
| LNP (lipid nanoparticle) | In vivo IV | Non-viral, transient expression, liver-tropic | Limited tissue targeting beyond liver | NTLA-2001, NTLA-2002 |
| Lentiviral vectors | Ex vivo | Stable integration, large cargo | Insertional mutagenesis risk | Lyfgenia |
| Concern | Detail |
|---|---|
| Off-target effects | Cas9 DSBs at unintended sites → large indels, translocations, chromothripsis |
| Genotoxicity | 2 SCD gene therapy patients developed blood malignancies 3–5.5 yrs post-transplant |
| AAV high-dose toxicity | Lethal ARDS reported in DMD CRISPRa trial (n-of-1, CRD-TMH-001, AAV9 @ 1×10¹⁴ vg/kg) — death 8 days post-infusion. Investigators attributed to AAV dose, not CRISPR |
| Immune response | Pre-existing anti-AAV antibodies, anti-Cas9 immunity |
| Cost/Access | Casgevy ~$2.2M; inaccessible to low-income countries (majority of SCD/TDT burden) |